data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e516f/e516fd127c756ebfe46312a5702cb8b7577292fb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8269a/8269a83cd46164edcfe79e6714a8ff1bfdb1060b" alt=""
There you go. You’re stating your own opinion instead of following capitalism’s laws like a sheep. I’m happy now.
There you go. You’re stating your own opinion instead of following capitalism’s laws like a sheep. I’m happy now.
I think Fallout London adds more to the game and was wanted by more people. Democracy and utility seem to be agreed on this case, and those are the two measures I use to determine importance.
No. Importance is a metaphysical construct, not a legal one.
Don’t take me too seriously. I’m doing a bit.
Qapla’!
Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.
Why are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
Meesa propose we give the chancellor emergency powers to lower the price of eggs!
Isn’t most of his wealth in stocks? If investors think Tesla is a bad stock (because no one will buy the cars), then Musk is poor.
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.
Amusingly, both of those creatures are rumoured to have relations with Lemmy users.
I think hating on Rowling is much better for the thread than talking about some silly misogynistic books.
There’s no excuse for using Xittter in 2025.
Yes. Decentralization has many benefits.