

Ah, I see. Sorry for the psychic damage.


Ah, I see. Sorry for the psychic damage.


Allergic to the term as I am or did I say something funny?


Taking this and your other comment into account, your point of view is very much justified. Two things:
When I refer to AI, I mean what we had in the moment of dignity right before OpenAI and Anthropic burst into the scene. AI algorithms lacked intelligence back then, just as they do today. I wish people had more respect for real human intelligence.


AI researcher here: cancer research – and all other research as well – has had access to AI for decades. This includes LLM models. It is doubtful that commercial models built on copyright infringement and Reddit content will play a key role in any cancer research breakthroughs.
Big AI companies keep pushing this narrative to silence critical voices.
If cure for cancer is something you wish to see in the future, my advice is to support universities in any way you can (funding being an obvious method). It is the job of universities to advance science in a manner that benefits everyone. Medical companies’ job is to serve shareholders’ money only. Its sad, but its true because its written in the law.
Thanks. I see my mistake now.