A 386 is probably underpowered, but a 486 could do it for sure. I used to play all the SNES games at 33mHz back in the day.

SNES emulators ran just fine on <100 mHz CPUs three decades ago. You’d have to try pretty hard to find a PC that couldn’t do that nowadays.

Where does one buy discs of bread for making bread?

I might go hardcore and build a welded frame for it.

The rails are 15mm x 10mm

Sounds like an issue on your end, not on DP’s end. You can 100% just plug in a DP cable into a powered-on computer and have it work instantly.

If you serve the syrup in a cup, then the syrup to waffle ratio is infinite.

They didn’t start the service, they bought it with the long term plan of making it profitable.

I don’t think he knows anything about it at all except that it’s made for the poors.

There are so many layers of separation between the CEO of a company like McDonald’s and where their ingredients come from.

And also how he talked about the product not as a food item but as a product, like there waa some abstraction between the fact that it can be eaten and the purpose of selling it.

It’s like they told him seconds before that it was edible, and he didn’t believe it buy kinda played along by taking a tiny bite.

You mean the second graphics card you’ll need.

I think it’s a fair comparison.

“Hey gamers, look what your GPU can do!” winking at the film/tv execs

I don’t think it’s really aimed at gamers though. It’s a tech demo for what their hardware can do. They say that it was run on a dedicated 5090 which means that to get the same result, you have to be running the game on a 5090 and have a second 5090 just for DLSS5.

This isn’t meant for consumers. It’s aimed at sectors of the market that want realtime gen AI processing of realtime footage, whether 3D generated or live action.

I think they’re purposely taking the backlash from the gaming community, which they obviously don’t care about anymore, to showcase the tech to a different market.

TempleOS would fall under the laws

So would DOS and Windows 95, but those haven’t had any updates in a couple years. Surely they’ll be updated to comply.

But what if you drank more water and you didn’t have the weight savings?

GOS’s argument over the attestation is that it’s essentially the same as Google’s system. It approves the devices themselves regardless of their security. An approved device isn’t more secure in any way just because it’s on the list. It’s just a way of arbitrarily excluding any OS that they don’t like while still allowing devices that are obsolete or behind on security updates.

No, that’s just the sugar. Someone decided figs weren’t sweet enough and that they should add sugar to them.

It literally stabbed him in the heart, which seems to me like an unlikely way to die to a stingray, but I’m no stingrayologist, so take that with a grain of salt.

It has neither the positive reputation you assume

This is true. Quebec French is often looked down on by other native French speakers. It’s seen as a rougher version of the language, mostly due to its accent and different pronunciations, and often Quebecois’ simplified vocabulary compared to the French. But what the previous comment was about is that Quebec French is closer to what French sounded like a couple centuries ago, and the language in France has shifted in a different way.

nor do Quebecois say “le stationnement”.

Yes we do.

Quebec has a problem with English in particular as it is seen as overtaking its culture. As such, a lot of English words that the French have directly adopted are instead translated into Frencher versions of the words. Stationnement vs parking is one example, magasinage vs shopping is another.

Yes the word for cat is “chat” but the word for chat, in the online sense is also “chat” and it’s pronounced like the English word. It should also be capitalised because it’s a proper noun, eliminating the ambiguity that may exist.