• pebbles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Would you care to explain yourself? Maybe explain how folks that would never produce either gamete fit into your binary based on gamete production? Or is that too advanced? I hear we are sticking to basic biology after all.

    • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Nobody’s body is a blank slate. Just because one developmental pathway didn’t turn out as expected doesn’t mean that it’s impossible to determine sex. Their bodies are still organized around producing one or the other of two gamete sizes, hence binary.

      • pebbles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        organized around producing one or the other of two gamete sizes

        This implies that the organization can fail then? That is how we put the outliers in the binary? That means that that kind of organization has a goal?

        That feels like common sense. Like in the culturally-rooted sense. Not necessarily a reflection of reality, but an easy idea to swallow. I don’t think human development has intention in that kind of way unless you are religious.

        I guess, what makes gamete production the goal of human development? What makes you confident that there is a goal to human development?

        To me it seems like it would be hard to answer those questions without anthropomorphizing human development.