• powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Sorry, you’re down in the list of comments in my inbox. They’d look for structures like these for diagnosis:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramesonephric_duct

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesonephric_duct

    There aren’t people born with bodies that just have “no concept” of how to produce a gamete, and that’s what I mean our bodies aren’t blank slates. Even if someone doesn’t actually produce gametes, the rest of their body is still structured in a sexed way, because we’re a sexually dimorphic species.

    • pebbles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I see what you’re saying. Something like “there are two sets of characteristics and most folks grab from the majority of one or the other. Therefore we can place everyone into one sex or the other.”

      I feel like when I first read your comments I took issue with how black and white your words seemed. I still kinda feel that.

      Is there some structure that’s presense or lack there of definitely defines sex for every person? If so I think its fair to call sex a binary.

      I feel like I’d only be convinced if I could understand what makes the options only 0 or 1 yk? It doesn’t seem to be chromosomes, which is what I was taught growing up. X/Y Chromosomes have more that two ways of existing in humans.

      I’ll read through those wiki articles a bit. To me it seems like your saying that there is some kind of structure that has no middle ground in humans. It always only goes one way or the other. No variation. It’s hard for me to picture life doing that. If ya have any more info to point to I’d be down to look at it.

      Edit: for example, would Ovotesticular Syndrome be a counter example to sex binary?

      Edit: it looks like there is some variation in rare cases with the development of Müllerian ducts. So that doesn’t seem to be a binary.

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Powerstruggle just trolls trans supportive posts for hours on end, judging by post history.

        You’re trying to reason with a bigot.

        • pebbles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Damn that post history do paint a pretty consistent picture. Seems there is only one thing for powerstruggle to talk about lol. Same talking point too with the “organized around producing certain gametes.”

          Thanks for pointing that out.

          • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            To be fair, I also call out lots of other misinformation, like people trying to say North Korea is great, actually. That just doesn’t get as much activity. In this thread alone I probably doubled my number of comments, but only because so many people tried to argue with me. The user you’re responding to also seems to believe that people they disagree with are trolls, which is not how that works.

            • pebbles@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Fair, I guess I only looked back two weeks or so. Would you respond to my above comment that talks about Ovotesticular syndrome and variation in müllerian duct development?