OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 months agoEpic boss Tim Sweeney thinks stores like Steam should stop labelling games as being made with AI: 'It makes no sense,' he says, because 'AI will be involved in nearly all future productionshare.googleexternal-linkmessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up1520arrow-down121file-text
arrow-up1499arrow-down1external-linkEpic boss Tim Sweeney thinks stores like Steam should stop labelling games as being made with AI: 'It makes no sense,' he says, because 'AI will be involved in nearly all future productionshare.googleOldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 months agomessage-square168fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMika@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down16·4 months agoSo don’t accept code that is shit. Have decent PR process. Accountability is still on human.
minus-squareBronzebeard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·edit-24 months agoThe people lazy enough to have ai generate their code aren’t going to do that. You’re acting like games didn’t already have bugs before we invented a mostly wrong shortcut that kinda looks just good enough to fake being useful.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-24 months ago So don’t accept code that is shit. Have decent PR process. Accountability is still on human. If this is necessary then there is, in point of fact, a “problem in keeping code quality while using AI”.
minus-squaredukemirage@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 months agoA decent review process is always necessary, LLMs or not.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoOK, sure, but again the claim was: there is no problem in keeping code quality while using AI Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
minus-squareMika@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoThis is necessary when working with 100% human code too.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoOK, sure, but again the claim was: there is no problem in keeping code quality while using AI Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
So don’t accept code that is shit. Have decent PR process. Accountability is still on human.
The people lazy enough to have ai generate their code aren’t going to do that. You’re acting like games didn’t already have bugs before we invented a mostly wrong shortcut that kinda looks just good enough to fake being useful.
If this is necessary then there is, in point of fact, a “problem in keeping code quality while using AI”.
A decent review process is always necessary, LLMs or not.
deleted by creator
OK, sure, but again the claim was:
Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.
This is necessary when working with 100% human code too.
OK, sure, but again the claim was:
Whether or not human-written code also requires review is outside the context of this discussion, and entirely irrelevant.