• Khrux@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I do agree entirely. If I could use the internet of 2015 I would, but I can’t do so in a practical way that isn’t much more tedious than asking an LLM.

    My options are the least rancid butter of the rancid butter restaurants or I churn my own. I’d love to churn my own and daydream of it, but I am busy, and can barely manage to die on every other hill I’ve chosen.

    • dil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      web search isnt magically going back to how it was, and its not just search engines its every mf trying tk take advantage of seo and push their content to the top, search is going to get worse evry year, ai did speed it up by making a bunch of ai images pop up whenever you search an image

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      problem is that the widespread use of (and thereby provision of your data to) LLMs contributes to the rise of totalitarian regimes, wage-slavery and destroying our planet’s ecosystem. Not a single problem in any of our lives is important enough to justify this. And convenience because we are too lazy to think for ourselves, or to do some longer (more effort) web research, is definitely not a good excuse to be complicit in murder, torture and ecoterrorism.

      • Koarnine@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I agree except for the fact that it’s unavoidable

        It’s horrific, but its inescapable, the problem is not going away and while you’re refusing to use LLMs to accelerate your progress, the opposition isn’t

        Don’t get me wrong, anyone who blindly believes sycophantic LLM garbage is a fool.

        Its taken 4 years to overcome my llm moral ocd - and its only because I need to start working, in a world where every company forces AI down your throat, there are many who simply have no choice if they want to compete

        Also I’m kinda glad I can spend more of my useful energy working towards my goals rather than battling the exact minutiae without any sort of guide

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The thing is: LLMs do not accelerate the progress of proper software development. Your processes have to be truly broken to be able to experience a net gain from using LLMs. It enables shitty coders to output pull requests that look like they were written by someone competent, and thereby effectively waste the time of skilled developers who review such pull requests out of respect for the contributor, only to find out it is utter garbage.

          • Koarnine@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I’m sorry but this is simply incorrect.

            What you are saying is true of pure vibe coding, but you get an insane net gain from using LLMs for sanity checks and as a general ‘bootstrap’ for a project.

            Yes it will make mistakes, but if you can actually program well so as to understand when it is incorrect, it is incredibly helpful as a tool.