I tried searching for answers as to why these machines are reaching out to numerous locations despite not using PrusaConnect. Location lookup returns the expected Czech, as well as location across the US. I recently also set a friend up with with an Elegoo printer and that was expectedly noisy as hell, but I was surprised with Prusa being the ‘privacy pick’.

For those curious, here’s the logs since about midnight, it seemingly doesn’t talk during the day.

209.51.161.238:123
195.113.144.238:123
23.150.41.122:123
193.29.63.226:123
162.244.81.139:123
64.246.132.14:123
172.104.182.184:123
66.85.78.80:123
68.234.48.70:123
129.250.35.250:123

Edit: Midnight brain forgot what ports are for, and that is for NTP, thanks yall

  • organ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Purely theatrical and serves no purpose or benefits. Any TA that penetrates the network would discover those subnets instantly.

    Performative opsec

      • organ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Oh noo, you completely defeated surveillance by hiding a screenshot of your privately routed address space, nooooo

        • 7toed@midwest.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I’m sorry for upsetting you so much. I don’t think I said I defeated surveillance so that’s on you.