I’m finding it harder and harder to believe that someone can be this stupid unintentionally.
“Tiny Man Square” LMAO…. The coward won’t even say it.
I’m finding it harder and harder to believe that someone can be this stupid unintentionally.
“Tiny Man Square” LMAO…. The coward won’t even say it.
What the heck is an anti-kitten burning coalition?
Edit: Found it: https://www.patheos.com/blogs/slacktivist/2012/02/27/rick-santorum-and-the-anti-kitten-burning-coalition/
If you read your theory, you would be aware that kittens are sustainable fuel and burning them is based.
I can’t wait for the new AI datacenters to be powered by orphan crushing machines
Some stupid shit they have to make up so they feel like they’re the good guys and everyone else are the bad guys.
Apparently we burn kittens?
Other way around. He’s accusing us of accusing them of (metaphorically) burning kittens so we can feel good about ourselves on some artificial high ground
Either way, it’s convoluted bullshit to make them appear either the victor or the victim. And it’s pathetic.
It’s a reference that I imagine political people under 35 won’t catch without doing a search online.
A reference:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/slacktivist/2014/12/21/the-anti-kitten-burning-coalition-again/
That link isn’t working for me.
Hm. To provide context then: It is an argument device used by Fred Clark, who goes by Slacktivist, in his writing. His posts are hosted on the Patheos site as he is a religious albeit leftist writer. The link I provided is just one article where he uses it.
That should hopefully help you navigate towards it, if you’re so inclined.
Yeah that worked, thanks for the help.