Lol. You keep replying dozens of times to people. You don’t have meaningfull contributions to the field. You think that blogs for some random Chicago emertis are reasonable sources. You constantly post opinions without a single definition to prove your point…
I think you are a sad child. Stop putting my science in your mouth.
Lol. You keep ignoring the papers I link you, then disparaging a well-respected biologist in the field by calling him a rando. If you don’t even know who Jerry Coyne is, you have no business bullshitting about the field of biology. He’s not the end-all-be-all but you’ve just displayed an amazing lack of knowledge about the field in general.
I’ll spell it out for you, since I fear you might have a learning disability: I’ve linked peer-reviewed papers. Read them and learn. I also cited Jerry Coyne writing on his blog about his field of expertise, as an example of an expert opinion on this matter. That’s a reasonable source for that purpose. I also cited a project led by a PhD developmental biology, collecting signatures from other scientists with relevant credentials. That it was published on wordpress is immaterial.
If your PhD is even real, you’re a perfect example of why they’re a mark of perseverance, not intelligence. I suggest you persevere at something more productive than wallowing in ignorance.
Truth is, you’ve already outed yourself. I eat lunch with a group of mixed biologists and I came into the conversation already knowing that reality (as is always the case) is much more complicated than you would say. I’ve heard this same conversation before by people who actually do research in the area. Not like mine–my research is rather trite compared to some of these dudes. They essentially publish in nature and the equivalent in their respective areas.
So, no, you are just a troll. To summarize:
You lack the credentials to make the assertions that you have.
You don’t seem to understand the hierarchy of trust that comes with certain positions.
You don’t seem to have any idea what sources are actually valid/quotable, nor the importance of peer review.
No, wordpress and other blogs still aren’t peer reviewed, so they are as much trash as a random ass reddit post. You can rage boner all you want about the qualifications of the person behind the keyboard, but words that are not peer reviewed are always just words.
You dismiss anyone else’s claims as immaterial because you seem to prefer a simple, comfortable world to reality.
If your PhD is even real, you’re a perfect example of why they’re a mark of perseverance, not intelligence.
I would agree 100%, but the difference is (once again) that as a holder of a PhD (albeit in a completely different area), I have the experience and authority to make that sort of claim. You are just some loser behind a keyboard.
But you go on and have a nice day. This was a laugh for a while but now it’s just boring watching some dude pissing in the wind.
Sigh. I linked to a comment I had previously made, which links to the author of Sex Redefined (peer-reviewed paper) clarifying that there are two sexes, and quote her inline for easy reading.
You’re right that I don’t link to the paper there, but it’s in the grandparent comment. Hit the “Show Context” button to get the link. Just so you can’t evade again, here’s the link:
That’s a peer-reviewed paper published in Nature by a PhD Developmental Biology. When asked to clarify, She directly stated that the papers claims there are two sexes.
You have no excuse to not engage with it. Stop acting in bad faith.
EDIT: You originally responded in the thread for my comment that linked directly to this peer reviewed paper, so you have no excuse. Stop your bullshit:
Lol. You keep replying dozens of times to people. You don’t have meaningfull contributions to the field. You think that blogs for some random Chicago emertis are reasonable sources. You constantly post opinions without a single definition to prove your point…
I think you are a sad child. Stop putting my science in your mouth.
Lol. You keep ignoring the papers I link you, then disparaging a well-respected biologist in the field by calling him a rando. If you don’t even know who Jerry Coyne is, you have no business bullshitting about the field of biology. He’s not the end-all-be-all but you’ve just displayed an amazing lack of knowledge about the field in general.
I’ll spell it out for you, since I fear you might have a learning disability: I’ve linked peer-reviewed papers. Read them and learn. I also cited Jerry Coyne writing on his blog about his field of expertise, as an example of an expert opinion on this matter. That’s a reasonable source for that purpose. I also cited a project led by a PhD developmental biology, collecting signatures from other scientists with relevant credentials. That it was published on wordpress is immaterial.
If your PhD is even real, you’re a perfect example of why they’re a mark of perseverance, not intelligence. I suggest you persevere at something more productive than wallowing in ignorance.
Truth is, you’ve already outed yourself. I eat lunch with a group of mixed biologists and I came into the conversation already knowing that reality (as is always the case) is much more complicated than you would say. I’ve heard this same conversation before by people who actually do research in the area. Not like mine–my research is rather trite compared to some of these dudes. They essentially publish in nature and the equivalent in their respective areas.
So, no, you are just a troll. To summarize:
I would agree 100%, but the difference is (once again) that as a holder of a PhD (albeit in a completely different area), I have the experience and authority to make that sort of claim. You are just some loser behind a keyboard.
But you go on and have a nice day. This was a laugh for a while but now it’s just boring watching some dude pissing in the wind.
You’re once again refusing to engage with peer-reviewed sources. Stop bullshitting.
Ask your biologist friends to explain to you slowly why you’re wrong.
No, I just honestly don’t care what internet trolls have to say. Lol.
You are so tied up in proving yourself but are laughably bad at it. XD
Right, so you’re refusing to engage with peer-reviewed sources.
Dude, in your first couple of posts you only managed to cite yourself. XD Peer review my ass. XD
This is not a serious conversation.
Sigh. I linked to a comment I had previously made, which links to the author of Sex Redefined (peer-reviewed paper) clarifying that there are two sexes, and quote her inline for easy reading.
You’re right that I don’t link to the paper there, but it’s in the grandparent comment. Hit the “Show Context” button to get the link. Just so you can’t evade again, here’s the link:
https://www.nature.com/articles/518288a
That’s a peer-reviewed paper published in Nature by a PhD Developmental Biology. When asked to clarify, She directly stated that the papers claims there are two sexes.
You have no excuse to not engage with it. Stop acting in bad faith.
EDIT: You originally responded in the thread for my comment that linked directly to this peer reviewed paper, so you have no excuse. Stop your bullshit:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03348-3
Look, I’m just finding it more productive to continue making fun of you. You just make it so easy. XD