So I was reading this article about Signal-creator Moxie Marlinspike’s new project, Confer , which claims to be a verifiably E2E encrypted LLM chat service. There are a couple of short blog articles that give the gist of it, and some github repos including this one that includes scripts for producing the VM that will run your particular LLM session. But if I’m following this all correctly, it implies that every chat session (or perhaps every logged-in user) would have their own VM running their own LLM to ensure that the chain of trust is complete. This seems impossible from a scalability perspective, as even small LLMs require huge quantities of RAM and compute. Did I miss something fundamental here?

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    off topic, but of all the fix-worthy things, that’s what needed his attention?

    • Lemmchen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      What other cryptographic practical applications are more worthy of his attention right now?

      • glitching@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        you should let go of the imprinted idea that in order to criticise something you hafta offer a better, fully fleshed out alternative; you are allowed to say X is shitty on its own.

        coming from the guy who improved and converted the utterly cumbersome PGP stack to a usable thing with TextSecure/RedPhone (those got later merged into Signal), yeah, this shit is underwhelming, to say the least.

        I’m gonna go out on a limb and state that securing the pipe between you and the word-guessing program isn’t currently high on anyone’s list.