AI is asbestos in the walls of our tech society, stuffed there by monopolists run amok. A serious fight against it must strike at its roots

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Reverse centaur” is a super clunky term, I think we should say “Minotaur” instead.

    A Centaur has the head of a person and the body of a beast, a Minotaur is the opposite.

    • kalkulat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Pretty sure a superb writer like Cory chose reverse centaur for a reason - to make it clearer that a human is becoming the servant of a machine.

    • pepeSilvia@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      The term isn’t just about which half is human though, it’s about the dynamic flip in humans relationship with tooling.

      The “tool” part of the centaur is the horse body. All of the hard to duplicate bits of a human (reasoning, processing, fine motor skills) with the strength and speed of a horse. A reverse centaur is when a complex system is designed that needs a “dumb human” to do the complex bits while the system uses humans as an appendage.

      Reverse centaur may sound clunky but is a really elegant one liner for Doctorow’s thesis.

    • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Minotaurs have some potential for badass imagery. Reverse Centaur sounds intentionally clunky.