• zloubida@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I always considered economics, philosophy, theology and law as (important) academic subjects which are not sciences.

      • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Indeed. But the sense of these words changed since they were adopted. Originally they just meant “teacher of general studies”.

        • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I like to think that they evolved in parallel, as Philosophy underpins all interpretations.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            34 minutes ago

            I’ve tried explaining this to people, and they just don’t get it. They say philosophy is just some pointless, meaningless, armchair activity. I tell them, “All fields of study are a subdiscipline of philosophy” and they call me a misinformed idiot.

            Like, dude, whatever you study, the field itself wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t firet developed by philosophers upon a philosophical foundation that was in turn developed by generations of philosophers.

            The history of philosophy is the history of human ideas and of humanity itself. All of the sciences, both hard and soft, are simply highly specialized fields of philosophy.