• a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      What’s wrong with Patreon? They advertise a 10% fee. It may be a little more complicated than that but 10% seems pretty reasonable considering the services they offer.

      • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        They are an American tech company.

        From what I remember, they did try to heavily raise fees and worsen the experience on their platform “my next trillion users … life changing blah blah … my ARPU”, but then backed off when they got public pushback. They will do it again when they think they can get away with it.

        Better to use something like liberapay.

        That’s what I use to donate to Piefed development and I’ve been meaning try and pitch this platform to my Patreon list.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        16 hours ago

        How is 10% reasonable. They just transfer money from A to B while showing people some static html text about the options. They basically do nothing.

        • a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          I wouldn’t say these services are nothing. Are they worth 10%? Eh.

          A 90/10 split for content creators who otherwise wouldn’t know how to build and operate their own platform doesn’t sound like a terrible deal. It’s not amazing but if there were better options, Patreon may not be so popular.

          Edit: I want to clarify. Patreon is a for profit company who has apparently tried raising prices already and back tracked. Eventually, Patreon will try and squeeze out more profit from the creators and the user base will be big enough that Patreon will have the leverage to do so; we’ve all seen it before. I’m not saying Patreon is a good company, I’m not saying they won’t be dicks in the future, I’m not saying the system as it is, is good. I’m only saying 10% isn’t a bad deal when so many other options are worse (ex. Apple taking 30%)

          • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It’s always getting fleeced with you guys and being fine with slightly less fleecing, when that is just a way to entice and reach a point where they can monopolize the market and fleece like the big dogs.

            And then a new company with slightly less fleecing appears, with board members from previous company.

            Rinse and repeat.

            • a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              I understand your view and sympathize deeply but there is a lot wrong in the world today and if I have to divert energy somewhere to try and change something, Patreon’s 10/90 split is at the bottom of the list for me at the moment. Regular working class people aren’t getting that good of a deal at the jobs they work at. I’m not even talking 90/10, just getting their .01% of the profits in a 1000 person org for their contribution would probably be life changing.

              You are right but our frames of reference are different.

        • fistac0rpse@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          14 hours ago

          static HTML text, and all of the posts, and images, and audio that they host. not saying that deserves 10% but saying that they do nothing other than payment processing is disingenuous