Recently I got really interested in debloating and hardening my operating systems, cause I’m heavily inspired by Unix and “worse is better” philosophy. As I heard bash is heavy and we have much more lightweight and faster alternatives like these mentioned in title. They must be great alternative for scripting and interpreting but is there any reason to use them on my machines as interactive shell? Anyone are using them? Also is it worth to learn them as bash is standard IT industry?

    • blackbrook@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The question is what does OP mean by 'heavy’and what benefit do they hope to get from a ‘lighter’ shell. Memory or performance seems inconsequential in this case, but how about attack surface? Is there some benefit from a security standpoint of running a simpler shell?

      • mlody@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        RAM doesn’t matter for me. Smaller code base is reducing attack surface for sure.

    • confusedpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I could imagine an it would matter more to people working with embedded devices.

      Also some people just like learning or doing random things. Nothing wrong with some exploration, discovery or learning.

      • mlody@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That’s why I’m asking that question :) A lot of discussions are on Reddit and I hate Reddit so to avoid using it I’m asking here.