Basically, there was a discussion about how instances have rules and Feddit also needs to abide by local (Austrian) law to not get in legal trouble.

And I get called a Zionazi for saying that you cant just up and call for the massacre of civilians, regardless of which side you are on.

It’s also ironic for Dessalines to mock me for sticking to rules and laws to protect our instance.

  • goat@sh.itjust.worksMEnglish
    65·
    2 days ago

    Then the second option or even the bare minimum option I suggested still applies. If you really cared or didn’t support that crap you’d be less willing to justify it, with horribly bad faith arguments no less. If you think Germany’s law means you need to act like a neoliberal to be safe and condemn what “Germany” sees as “”“bigotry”“”[1] then you have made the choice to side with Zionists out of fear of persecution.

    Hey, probably not a good idea to be using triple quotes around certain words. It dips into the triple parentheses. Please edit.

    • Draconic NEO@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      41·
      2 days ago

      This sounds like quite a reach, I looked in that article and found nothing on quote marks. I also googled it and found only mentions of parentheses. I also found this thread. So from what I see, it’s not grammatically correct, no. It’s a bit demeaning, but it is a huge reach to compare it to triple parentheses.

      • goat@sh.itjust.worksMEnglish
        44·
        2 days ago

        I gotta be super conservative with anything that may resemble a dogwhistle in this community. There was a fiasco a while ago where a user used a certain word that could be taken as fascist. I ended up having to do damage control and ban said user.

        So please edit, just remove the triple quotations and any suggestions that the German government is being coerced with their hatespeech law.