Basically, there was a discussion about how instances have rules and Feddit also needs to abide by local (Austrian) law to not get in legal trouble.

And I get called a Zionazi for saying that you cant just up and call for the massacre of civilians, regardless of which side you are on.

It’s also ironic for Dessalines to mock me for sticking to rules and laws to protect our instance.

    • Draconic NEO@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here, let me spell it out for you. People who ask this question are usually asking it with the intention of using it as a gotcha for people against the ocupation of Palestine by saying that said person against Zionist occupation is advocating death towards Israeli citizens, and then saying that they are “antisemitic” because of it.

      Now in short it is simple but see, loaded questions cannot be given simple answers because the ambiguity of simple answers to loaded and often misrepresented questions is abused by bad faith actors. I think you know this very well, and the fact you still seek a simple answer that can be misconstrued or used as a gotcha is concerning to say the least.

      • goat@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can be against more than one thing at once. Being in support of Palestine doesn’t mean all israeli civilians should die.