UltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agoNot that limitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1517arrow-down125
arrow-up1492arrow-down1imageNot that limitlemmy.worldUltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squaremercano@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down1·20 hours agoThat’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·17 hours agoThere’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
minus-squareAlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·edit-214 hours agoChatGPT is such garbage. edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
minus-squareSeptugenarianSenate@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 minutes agoclaude is gaud
minus-squarebunchberry@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 hours agoChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
minus-squarePeppycito@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·18 hours agoRote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.
That’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
There’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
ChatGPT is such garbage.
edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
claude is gaud
ChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
Rote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.