Today, we are releasing the full CAD files for the CORE One and CORE One L frames.

There seems to be a custom licence.

The Restriction: You cannot commercially exploit the design files (selling the product or remixes) without a separate agreement.

The Protection: It includes an explicit patent license grant, protection against AI data mining, and a codified Right-to-Repair.

Most of the linked article is about the licence.

There’s been a lot of talk about Prusa turning evil. Maybe it’s a good step back.

  • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yet a lot of those businesses lean on the work of prusa.
    Friend of mine always used creality their shitty slicer clone for his ender 3 v2, then got a bambu and was amazed by all the settings and options, different supports etc etc.
    Told him he should have switched to prusaslicer ages ago, which bambu’s slicer is based on and the sole reason its open source.
    (Also, orca slicer > bambu studio)

    Prusa has been fighting the enshitification of 3d printing so badly, they are going under while other companies are standing on their shoulders and pushing them under ><

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yet a lot of those businesses lean on the work of prusa.

      Yes, a lot of the groundwork was done by prusa, and yes a lot of companies are standing on their shoulders. Prusa 100% deserves a lot of credit for enabling what 3D printing has become today, no doubt about that…but they haven’t really been innovative or at the front of 3D printing for a while, they stagnated and have been overtaken as a consequence.

      Edit: most of the cheap Chinese manufacturers are ahead because they lean massively in to klipper and rely on the community there.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Prusa has innovated. Not on their printers, agreed there, but in the slicer they have. And imo, those brands that are standing on prusa’s shoulders should pay them for that work but afaik, and do correct me if im wrong, they dont. Bambu does nothing back for prusa, the opposite even. They are killing the shoulders they are standing on and barely do something for communities. Creality was also that bad until they were forced to by a chinese maker that is now at large.
        Then other companies came and took creality’s crown by using the opened designs.

        I joined the 3d printing scene at the wrong time as i saw giants like prusa slowly fall and be replaced with shit heads like bambu

          • Mechanismatic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Granted it’s from a partnership, but the INDX extruder seems to be on the cusp, so the idea that Prusa is behind seems odd. And the fact that they’re more open and consumer friendly than Bambu is great. There are a lot of affordable printers that have benefited from Prusa’s development while Prusa is still dropping new developments, seemingly at a greater rate now than previously.

          • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            And im saying its not, because their changes still flow upwards towards the bambu slicer and the popular fork of fork, orca slicer, which are both based on prusaslicer and still integrate changes of prusaslicer. They have reduced in quatity and quality, because prusa is going under because of the shit of others