• RickyRigatoni@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    So many people in the comments (of the linked site) butthurt over this decision. Ai generated code is just bad, bro. Nobody wants a program coded by someone who doesn’t understand the output.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m really glad to hear that.

    Funny that the top comment is a pro AI guy trying to cancel the people who are criticizing it for not being part of the project, when AI by definition does not give care about, or understand, any code it creates.

  • Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Gods. The second I saw that Torvalds used an LLM to generate any amount of code I knew people would be annoying as shit about it. And here we are with people being annoying as shit about it.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Maybe you should try to learn what value Torvalds sees in it then and be a little less knee jerk about it

      • Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        Where in my comment did I mention my stance on LLM usage? All I said was I knew people would be annoying about Torvalds using LLMs to generate code, and that there was an instance of that here.