

Humans are illogical creatures who hype over irrational things. Some random key players pulling strings to heard the mob just a little but no greater strategy exists then “make money by any means possible fuck everyone else”"


Because in my personal experience through use 25% doesn’t seem quite right.
Besides these companies have a monetary incentive to ensure LLMs show high numbers on these tests. One of the most widely use tests (bench verified) is itself a currated selection of problems. In real world usage the failure rate is going to be much higher.
A rational person trust but verifies, and at least for me the verification doesn’t hold up to even a tiny bit of scrutiny so having doubts is a perfectly healthy thing to do.
Just because someone disagrees with with a data source does not make them irrational. There are some extremely well verified truths that are irrational to dismiss but not all data sources / studies have had that amount of rigor applied against them. Data can tell a story, but it doesn’t always tell the whole truth. People manipulate data to their own benifit.
People confuse the scientific method and academic research for “this one academic source says this it must be true” when really you need more then that.


Keep in mind significant effort was put into ensure Chernobyl didn’t experience further thermal detonation. It could get a lot worse. Especially with bigger reactors.
All being said there are safer reactor types but do you really trust the same people who put doge in charge with getting that implemented correctly so it doesn’t explode? Especially with the increased interest in small scale reactors that would be much closer to people.


I’m honestly sure the failure rate is higher then 25% those test they boat about are currated.


Nuclear is the lesser evil. But I think we should be clear that nuclear can Have a catastrophic effect on the environment if manged incorrectly. Like render entire swaths of earth inhabitable. Like beyond high temperature. Places that mean immediate silent death
But properly managed nuclear is like the greatest thing to ever happen to humanity.
But I will say in light of recent… Events, my faith that humanity could properly manage our waste if nuclear were to become more prolific has wained dramatically.


It’s really not though. If you think it is I really suggest to re-think your perspective on what maintainable shippable code looks like. It’s basically automating copying from stack overflow. There’s so many little considerations that come into development.


Meta the same company that changed it’s name from “Facebook” to the name of its now failed venture the “meta verse”.
The company that spent BILLIONS trying to get people give up reality for “VR chat but make it Microsoft teams”.
Your confused they are making a bad purchase based on hype? Why?
I don’t really care if people are on their phones if it’s on low brightness


They want to require IDs which requires validation, which requires a central authority. Any websites you hit that require the check will request it from the OS which will need to verify with central authority. So they’ll know what websites your hitting.


There are SOOOOOO many ways to implement age verification checks. And this is one of the worst. What is wrong with people


Get a android you lunatic


What a small world! I made a TOR P2P messaging app using symmetric encryption as a POC in college! I was just getting around to re implementing it into something more polished!
Not sure if I have a reason too now!
Old college app, new project doesn’t have much progress


I wish the Internet never existed so I wouldn’t have to see opinions like these
Honestly is more surprising any human is relatively rational. We are animals after all. I’m starting to realize thinking deeply about anything might be the exception not the rule. Most people are idiots
Unfortunately not


Fucking idiots. I’m surrounded by idiots
New flash AI and people flat out lie or make claims false claims with little care.


It’s not. That’s the problem. It actually sucks ass. It’s super low quality for anything more complex they s very simple CRUD app or a simple function. I say this as someone who s a heavy LLM user. It’s just bad code. It makes all kinds of simple mistakes. Just because code compiles doesn’t mean it’s good or does what you need it to do
Except information from Google was human made at least to some degree. With LLMs there is no guarantee