• bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    6 hours ago

    What distinguishes zebras from horses is that zebras live in anonymous herds. That is, they like to clump together to ward off predators, but they don’t know or like each other. They are not a uniform group with a leader. Horses on the other hand do have authorities and followers among them. And humans can hijack the role of the leader.

    CGPGrey: The Real Reason We Don’t Ride Zebras (6:23)

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      6 hours ago

      zebras live in anonymous herds. That is, they like to clump together to ward off predators, but they don’t know or like each other.

      Zebra’s don’t like anyone, and they’re not afraid to show it. Repeatedly.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What distinguishes zebras from horses is that zebras live in anonymous herds.

      says a lot about 4chan, the penny arcade GIFT theory, etc

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        With how Facebook forces real names, the idea that being anonymous has any influence where or not someone is a fuckwad had been debunked.

        • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s not the anonimity that makes people fuckwads. It’s the lack of immediate consequences. A fuckwad won’t get a punch in the face for what they say on facebook, hence they feel they can say anything and be a fuckwad.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            4 hours ago

            “Social media made y’all way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it”, Mike Tyson

            Regardless of how you feel about Tyson, Truth is Truth.

        • tempest@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          In a large enough group there is still anonymity even if your face and name are on there.

    • stenAanden@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This makes me wonder… How much of what he says is just conjecture? Do we ACTUALLY know with good certainty that zebras can’t be domesticated due to their nature? Or is it just a hypothesis/theory that has reached widespread popularity?

      I have heard that zebras (along with other African animals) can’t be domesticated because they have evolved to live among humans, when we were still man-apes. But that maybe that’s just conjecture too.

      Note how he have no sources in his video or description. And his comparison to chickens, cows, sheep and cats don’t seem to make much sense. The relation between humans and chickens/cows/sheep is markedly different from that of horses. Do wild fowl really have family structures? Cats don’t yet they are still docile among humans.

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I saw a historic photo in a magazine once, where some European colonial officers tried to tame and ride zebras

        • stenAanden@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          But what if we spent longer time doing it? Like centuries, like with most other domesticated animals.

          • stray@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’m not sure why you’ve been downvoted because you absolutely could domesticate them given sufficient time and consistent selective breeding. You could turn them into crabs if you wanted to. The trouble is that they don’t have a very social disposition, so no one is motivated to dedicating their entire bloodline to the project. Most domestication happened kind of on accident as we developed symbiotic or exploitative relationships with various species.

          • BCsven@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Might take more than centuries, but yes.

            We have a rescue dog from Korea as well as some neighbours ( not a standard breed, but a Korean Village dog, they basically live alongside humans as a breed but developed their own way). They are much different than “normal” dogs. They are more like cats. Their way on their terms. Like other dogs, don’t enjoy humans much. So even though they are domesticated, they still show the old lineage of being independent. My dogs idea of a good time is never chasing a stick or ball, but finding the highest vantage point at a park and watching everyone. A carryover from watching the plains from the hillside, or something.

          • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Domesticated animals generally start out already being somewhat agreeable. Like dogs hung around us, and work in a pack mentality, horses same thing, cats same thing. That’s why we could domesticate racoons or some rodents if we wanted to.

            Zebras are assholes and hate everyone