- cross-posted to:
- piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- cross-posted to:
- piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
In a first-of-its-kind ruling, a Spanish court has labeled VPN services as “technological intermediaries,” ordering them to actively block IP addresses that host illegal LaLiga matches. The “dynamic” injunction compels NordVPN and ProtonVPN to intervene, similar to local ISPs. But with both companies operating outside EU jurisdiction with privacy-centric business models, it remains unclear if and how the order will actually be enforced.


I wouldn’t use Mullvad when it’s openly hostile to peer-to-peer torrenting. Even outside of the obvious – piracy is one of the best and most unique use cases for a VPN – I use torrents wherever the option is available for legal downloads because that’s normally faster, spares a load on the server, and strengthens the download’s resiliency. That Mullvad wants to restrict that is their (reasonable) call, but it’s not one that’s going to get my money.
I’ve been using Mullvad for awhile now and torrenting works fine.
I did notice a behaviour that LibTorrent 1.2.x works better than 2.x and some endpoints don’t play nice.
If you’re willing to give it another spin try Netherlands.
They don’t explicitly ban torrenting, but they banned port forwarding in 2023 which heavily limits who you can connect to.
Ah I see what you mean.
It relies on the other side to have an open NAT or support UDP hole punching.
In my experience this works fairly well with μTP enabled.