How a single hack infected the world’s most important operating system.

  • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I feel the same way. I feel like I would love his subject matters he picks, but he’s being so disrespectful of the viewers time that I can’t stand it. Just the clickbait title alone is enough to put me off.

    • dusty_raven@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I’m surprised to find so much Veritasium hate on Lemmy. I always thought Derek and the team did a good job as far as edutainment goes. I also don’t like clickbait titles, but it’s worth noting that all of the videos are a real production with a crew of people who work full time and deserve to get paid.

      • Broken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t think anybody is critiquing the production quality or the right to get paid. I’ve seen nothing but complaints about the content quality (sensationalism) in the comments.

        For me, I don’t hate the guy or the channel. But I found I stopped watching his videos. I just felt like they were too long and could get to the point faster. I didn’t really see it as sensationalism myself, but understand that view. He’s essentially building it up to say why this is a big deal and you should continue watching the video.

        I just see it as an hour long video can still be made very well if it were half that. There’s a time commitment involved so when I see fluff that could have been cut it makes me not want to watch. The fluff doesn’t add value, not even entertainment wise.

      • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I guess his flavour of tainment just doesn’t jam well with me. Like I said, it’s not the subject matter, but the content just feels needlessly padded. Compare this to videos by Tom Scott, CGP Grey, Matt Parker, Steve Mould, etc. Those videos are far more dense with content It reminds me of how mythbusters gets so much better once you take out the narrator and the endless recaps…

        Regarding clickbait - to me a title this one is just another symptom of that disregard for the viewers time. Being coy and mysterious about the subject matter to lure people in. And yeah, hat’s probably why it works.

        I agree that the production values are incredibly high. But I just can’t stand being treated like a simpleton who needs drama to be tricked into watching videos, it feels very patronising.

      • hietsu@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Don’t have any concrete reasons why I try to avoid that channel nowadays but something about his character and argumentation style they use for to the scripts just gives me a feeling of ”bullshit sensationalism”. Just a few years back I really used to like the channel.

        • dusty_raven@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          That video is more of a (justified) takedown on sponsored content on Veritasium from 4 years ago and yeah, sponsored content sucks. I’m not saying that Veritasium is perfect, I’ll just have to keep an open mind while watching their videos going forward.