cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43768262

Some may have believed they were against AI being used for war. They just don’t want it to make the final kill decision.

The argument given by those supporting them is that AI in the military was inevitable, so their position is a reasonable one.

  • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Well yeah, Anthropic’s statement said as much. And they already had a contract with the DoD. This isn’t a gotcha.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I mean, yeah. They’re the only ones trying to hold out some reasonable constraints.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          No. They aren’t the “good guy,” and they don’t need to be lauded as such.

          Anthropic has been willing to throw away so many reasonable constraints, and they always have. The companies are disturbingly similar, and Anthropic is worse in some ways.