Idk what you mean about constant grid line thickness, but if that’s your sticking point, stop assuming it. The waffle in the post certainly doesn’t have it. Regardless, you’re incorrect, more squares = more surface area, smaller squares = more squares. If you shrunk a billiards ball to the size of a golf ball, which one would have more surface area?
Idk what you mean about constant grid line thickness, but if that’s your sticking point, stop assuming it. The waffle in the post certainly doesn’t have it. Regardless, you’re incorrect, more squares = more surface area, smaller squares = more squares. If you shrunk a billiards ball to the size of a golf ball, which one would have more surface area?