The Foundation sees this as a contradiction to the EU’s own interoperability goals. Although XLSX is standardized as OOXML according to ISO/IEC 29500, Microsoft’s implementations often deviate from the specifications. Furthermore, features often change undocumented, which complicates compatibility with open-source software such as LibreOffice.

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In college my professor wouldn’t accept pdfs for assignments because I guess he couldn’t check the metadata or make comments or something.

    So I literally had to download MS office just to submit assignments in their format…

    • B-TR3E@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are some people who míght learn from a ransomware attack. Only if it personally hits them, of course.

        • B-TR3E@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Ransomware attack are successful mostly against MS Active Directory and Ourlook based setups.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            That’s hilarious. Big corporation apparently can’t afford basic cybersecurity. Always pinching pennies.

            Anyway, any big organization should encrypt their core systems to prevent ransomware attacks. Individuals should too. It’s just good practice.

            • B-TR3E@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Encryption alone won’t prevent ransomware to encrypt it again. The original files need to be readable after all, so they are either unencrypted at boot or appear unencrypted to the (infected) client by machine/session key management. Nevertheless, adding an addittional, "“hostile” encryption layer will make them unreadable. The reasonable thing would be not to use a monocultural, standard setup that is known to be vulnerable to that kind of attack and first of all to get rid of fucking Outlook which has always been a dumpster fire.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        The web version is even worse! It’s all cloud-based, and you need a subscription unless your University pays for a license.

        The only reason to use it would be to write things in Libre and then copy/paste them into MS and manually fix all the formatting.

        I hated it, because all the professors could just smugly say “You know you have free access to Office 365 with your student email, right?”

        That’s not the fucking point! I don’t give a shit if it’s free, I don’t want to use a fucking microsoft product, especially one that’s cloud-based, when there’s a perfectly good open-source alternative that I can run locally on my own hardware.

        Just one of the many problems with the corporatization, commodification, and enshittification of education. If the focus was on learning and academic freedom, FOSS solutions would be encouraged. But no, you’re forced to use proprietary software, because “reasons” capitalism…

        • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          The web version is even worse! It’s all cloud-based, and you need a subscription unless your University pays for a license.

          You don’t actually need a subscription for the cloud web version actually. It’s ass though.