Firefox’s free VPN will offer 50 gigabytes of monthly data, which is pretty generous for a browser-based VPN. A Mozilla account is required to make use of it, which isn’t a hardship (they’re free), but is a point of friction some may wish to know upfront.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So a VPN could basically sniff the Diffie-Hellman keys used during the exchange, recreate the key that browser and server use for HTTPS, and then decrypt all traffic sent through the VPN? Is that correct? And basically the same goes for any ISP or whatever else that’s acting as a node?

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      No, not at all. You have 2 encrypted connections A to B and B to C, where B is the proxy server. The proxy server decrypts AB, sees the plaintext traffic to check against rules, then reencrypts the traffic with his own key and forwards it to B to C. Your browser on C sees the proxy servers cert for BC, and the website and proxy handle out a different cert AB. No encryption or cert is broken during the process.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      So if they were going to do an attack like this, they wouldn’t do anything like the DH attack you’re talking about, they’d have a custom CA in the browser’s SSL root store. That root cert means they can generate a certificate for any website you visit, and that custom root cert would be how they decrypt your traffic.

      Afaik there isn’t a current attack on proper DH key pairings, but you can’t block the custom certificate path at the browser level without some serious server side work/client side JS to validate