Per the very first reply on their thread discussing it in their forums, which I linked directly to for the post title:

We’ll NEVER require any verification or identification from the user.

However, what’s gonna happen should the attempts to age-gate the XDG portal screw over alt-init distros like Artix too? My guess is maybe they start blocking regions which force age gating like Arch Linux 32 is doing.

  • VonReposti@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No, it is the OS verifying what you know. The OS doesn’t care if you gave your password to anyone, just that whoever is opening the PC knows the password.

    Verifying who you are would be biometric verification or ID verification.

    In my case I require a password and a hardware key on login. That is still not verifying that I am myself, only that I know the password, and have the hardware key. If I added fingerprint scanning then I would have the holy trifecta and only then verify who I am.

    • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If you think about it like that none of the proposed laws verify anything, even the worst one just verified you logged into the account with credentials for someone who put their DOB in the age bracket returned by the API

      • VonReposti@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        And that’s why I fear what comes next now that the infrastructure has been set for sharing sensitive data like DoB. Brazil’s law already stated that self-reporting age is not sufficient.