Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-222 days agoNow listen here you little shitmedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down163
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1imageNow listen here you little shitmedia.piefed.socialEk-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-222 days agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squareViatorOmnium@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·edit-222 days agoThat’s one of the failure modes, good orgs would have design and review processes to stop it. There are other classics like arbitrary deadlines, conflicting and shifting requirements and product direction, perverse incentives, etc. I would even say that the AI craze is a result of the latter.
minus-squarePapstJL4U@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·22 days agoYeah, certain code developed organically (aka shifting demands). Devs know the code gets worse, but either by time or money they don’t have the option to review and redo code.
That’s one of the failure modes, good orgs would have design and review processes to stop it.
There are other classics like arbitrary deadlines, conflicting and shifting requirements and product direction, perverse incentives, etc.
I would even say that the AI craze is a result of the latter.
Yeah, certain code developed organically (aka shifting demands). Devs know the code gets worse, but either by time or money they don’t have the option to review and redo code.