• CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I was wondering how this stance will impact that deal. A large company like Motorola would typically seek to comply with laws such as these

    • just2look@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m hoping they already had the discussion with Motorola about it. I’m assuming Motorola wouldn’t be on the hook legally since Graphene is the OS provider. I could be wrong though.

      • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, hopefully worst case, Motorola just doesn’t ship them with Graphene (which could be a security risk anyway). Then they’d be off the hook.

    • Flipper@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      In the worst case it will just be Motorola shipping their base android version with verification and then just flashing grapheme over it. Just the way it currently works with pixels.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Remember Motorola phones are made by Lenovo which is now an Indian company.

      • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Irrelevant. They need to comply with the laws of the market they are selling at.

        Check what pornhub decided to do in Texas