Myrient dies today, but Minerva-archive.org rises in its place! Thank you to all of those who helped to keep this 390 TB treasure trove alive 🫡

  • misk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I’m not worried about backups since all of Myrient content originated elsewhere. The true value of Myrient was how accessible and fast it was and that’s the hard part that this project hasn’t demonstrated yet.

  • skankhunt42@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I have 48TB usable storage at home and it cost a lot to set up. Where do these guys store 390TB of data?! I’d love to keep a local copy.

    • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Some people have access to corporate cast-offs, so there are some people sat on massive supplies of used gear… It all disappears somewhere eventually 🤭

      • skankhunt42@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Ah, good point. I had a few 1u servers from work but never got many disks. They always had to be destroyed with an actual certificate of destruction… Everything else was taken to recycling in my personal vehicle.

        • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          47 minutes ago

          I can tell you right now that not everything that goes to recycler and gets a cert even gets wiped.

          Someone, somewhere said it was, therefore, the box is ticked.

          And this will remain so until there isn’t an economic imperative.

          • ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 minutes ago

            i used to work for a company with sensitive data. disks that did get a certificate, where wiped by our guys first. then a truck from the recycling/destruction company would arrive and disks get shredded 1 at a time. the whole setup was in a way, that you could observe the disks being torn into pieces, somewhat bigger than sawdust.

            two of our IT guys, two of the guys doing the destroying and some C-Suit would have to sign for every disk they observed being torn to pieces. if you do want to make sure your data is gone, there are ways to do it. admittedly, this way is a bit of a stunt. but it was fun being paid for observing bits of metal being reduced to pieces.

            • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 minutes ago

              So, I present my paradox: If the data was sensitive, it wouldn’t be disposed of properly. If the data is irrelevant or encrypted at rest, the disks are disposed of unneccisarilly.

              I bet what you were handling wasn’t -that- comparatively sensitive, so its a whole bunch of human effort and material being pulverised for no reason.

              Because I can ensure you that the people who should -always- be that thorough are not. Especially right now. There’s all sorts of drives that shouldn’t be out in the wild, out in the wild.

              I’m a little surprised there isn’t buyers for liberated disks (and their data) from ASEAN datacenters.

              Additionally, if an attacker wanted to steal your business data, they’d be your contracted, approved disposal partner already.