When I began building my server rig - which includes my torrenting setup - last year, I was able to find the 4TB 2.5 inch SATA SSD Samsung 870 EVO for about €300. I bought four of them, but now, I’m running out of space, so I checked a couple of retailers. Wowee. What is going on with these prices. 😂 Even Micron’s Crucial brand, which at some point was the more affordable option, is way past it’s curfew. 🤬

I just wanted to vent.

Since I’m one of those people who’d rather sleep in an anechoic chamber or at the very least use white noise or the likes in order to sleep, running HDDs doing random reads and writes next to my bed in my single room apartment is not a option.

  • durinn@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    No, I’m just torrenting. Video only. Music I stream and games I buy. So for now, we’re talking 15TB of series and movies.

    • ResistingArrest@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yes but how regularly are you watching any given terabyte of video? You should look into getting some kind of data on what media is accessed and if it hasn’t been accessed in something like 30 days, get rid of it.

      • mrnobody@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You must be young and don’t understand seeding lol. Probably on Torrentio or Streamio or whatever.

        • exu@feditown.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Curating what content you download is completely unrelated to how long you seed it.

      • durinn@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I know that, but I also want to keep seeding. It’s a balance, I guess. But perhaps I could remove that which I haven’t watched for 90 days and whose share ratio has reached 1.0 or that hasn’t changed for 90 days. That way, I can enjoy having the files around and keep seeding that which has some popularity.

        • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You could get some big hdds and move the things there you aren’t seeding anymore, so they won’t be active unless you’re watching something from them.

        • ResistingArrest@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If you’re really interested in having all of the media locally, this is probably the move for you. I’m a big proponent for paying for a debrid service & using stremio + torrentio and only downloading locally what I KNOW I’m gonna watch again.

    • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You could consider running your collection through Handbrake. It’s pretty easy to shed 90% of video file size while barely losing any noticeable quality.

      • durinn@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Wow! I’m saving this regardless. Great “GUI” for ffmpeg and whatnot. Thanks for the recommendation! I’m extremely picky about quality, watching everything on my 43 inch 4K TV. Banding in dark areas and gradations are the worst. XD

        • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah “just running it through handbrake” is a great way to make things look much worse. Encoding is pretty complicated

          • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I routinely reduce size 50%-70% and play it on a 65" 4k TV and you can’t tell the difference.

            Sometimes I can actually improve the original video by applying noise reduction.

            As for power - it really depends on your hardware and what you’re trying to do. Since I use an Intel SFF desktop, I have the option of using QSV for conversion and my rig peaks at 80 watts. Not that my peak matters because QSV is very power efficient and fast - takes perhaps 20 min to convert a 6GB video to 1-2 GB.

            • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Using AMD VCE, I’ve been able to do the same with a remux, taking it from 33GB down to 5GB. My first attempt on that one got the file size all the way down to 3GB but there was some rough artifacting on the studio logos at the start and intro credits. I decided the extra 2GB was worth it for that minor bump. Bizarrely, the rest of the film seemed fine but I could have missed something since I didn’t bother with a full watch.

        • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If your gonna do it I would use something like tdarr which is designed for that purpose, but honestly, thats a huge waste of power and time in my opinion. Best solution long term is to just delete and re-download. It will be a constant problem for you otherwise. You will always need more storage.