With exceptions in cases like when a couple loses a child

Edit: in a scenario where everything is good. No wars, no famine.

  • Karl@literature.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    What’s your point with this question?

    I wanted to know what people think and what could be the pros and cons etc. That’s why people ask questions, don’t they?

      • Karl@literature.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I never said that. Why’re you soo intent on putting words into my mouth?

        Population could also be controlled by neutering men.

        • Velma@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not when it is a two child policy - women still birth those children.

          Fundamentally this is a question centered around controlling women’s bodies because it’s women that bear and birth children.

          • Karl@literature.cafeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            And men still produce sperm. If we neuter them after 2 children we can still do it. Not that I like that. Just saying there is something else

              • Karl@literature.cafeOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I notice that you have replied to my other comment. You must know I meant that as an upper limit. Is there a reason you need to pretend you didn’t read it?