With exceptions in cases like when a couple loses a child

Edit: in a scenario where everything is good. No wars, no famine.

  • Velma@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Any population control question is going to be in bad taste.

    I’m not the only person to have a bad reaction to this question and you know it.

    There are no good answers for population control that doesn’t include torturing humans.

    • Karl@literature.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      So? It still doesn’t mean the question is about controlling women. And the point of asking questions is to learn something you might not know.

      To say that questions themselves are bad is promoting blind faith.

      There are no good answers for population control that doesn’t include torturing humans

      This is an answer, my guy. Instead of acting suspicious for no reason, you could just do this and have a healthy discussion.

      And my question wasn’t ‘Why do you think 2 child policy is good?’ It was ‘Do you think two child policy is good?’ Which could be answered with ‘NO’ which is a good answer (if there isn’t a moral way to implement it).

      I’m not the only person to have a bad reaction to this question and you know

      You’re not peer pressuring me lmfao. If that bothered me I’d have deleted the post already. XD