fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 15 hours agoA lot less blue too... Hmmmm....mander.xyzimagemessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1712arrow-down17
arrow-up1705arrow-down1imageA lot less blue too... Hmmmm....mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 15 hours agomessage-square48fedilink
minus-square/home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·9 hours agoSecond picture looks smogier and more polluted
minus-squarePoopingCough@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·edit-27 hours agoWell the second pic is also at night with a high iso and long exposure plus it’s digital so there’s a lot more noise going on.
minus-squareIMALlama@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 hours agoSpeaking in generic terms, film is way more forgiving of over exposure and digital is way more forgiving of under exposure. A fast lens is always king, but once you hit parity on that I would personally take digital for low light any day.
minus-squarePoopingCough@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 hours agoCopy that, my knowledge of the specifics of digital vs analog is about exhausted just from what i posted so i appreciate the added information!
Second picture looks smogier and more polluted
Well the second pic is also at night with a high iso and long exposure plus it’s digital so there’s a lot more noise going on.
Speaking in generic terms, film is way more forgiving of over exposure and digital is way more forgiving of under exposure. A fast lens is always king, but once you hit parity on that I would personally take digital for low light any day.
Copy that, my knowledge of the specifics of digital vs analog is about exhausted just from what i posted so i appreciate the added information!