• Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    There’s describing someone’s inability to understand easy concepts and there’s using a medical condition in a derogatory manner.

    Similarly, frowning upon the n-slur does not imply that we have no more words for referring to people of color.

    • turdas@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Mental retardation hasn’t been a widely recognized medical condition for at least 30 years. They started scrubbing the term out of diagnostic criteria in the 90s and I think the last one to use it was officially retired in the 00s.

      • Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        That is not what I suggested. I compared your logical fallacy to a more extreme example in hopes that you notice how short-sighted your argument was.

        To remind you, your comment implied “If I can’t use <swear word>, how else will I refer to <group of people>?”.

        There are plenty of other words you can choose from both in place of the r-slur and the n-slur. Arguing that this in any way limits your vocabulary is incredibly narrow-minded.