Read the whole thread

However, we don’t have a “hardened security” approach, we aren’t developing a phone for pedo(censored) so they can evade justice.

  • blackbrook@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I can’t believes he’s intentionally anti-privacy. Occam’s razor suggests he’s instead a fucking idiot.

    • rbits@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah maybe. But whether it’s intentional or not, I would not want to use /e/os.

      But also, from the linked thread:

      Murena is a for-profit company owned by shareholders including Gaël Duval. /e/ has a non-profit organization which is also led by Gaël Duval. /e/ includes paid services from Murena. /e/ very clearly exists to build products for Murena to sell in order to enrich the shareholders.

      Despite being done for profit, /e/ receives millions of euros in funding from the EU on an ongoing basis. /e/ and Murena use extraordinarily inaccurate marketing to not only promote their products/services but also to mislead people about GrapheneOS and scare them away from it.

      From @grapheneos.org

      • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Graphene made an OS only for Google phones. I can see what they mean here, but not sure they have room to talk regardless of the security circumstances.

        It is shitty if there was a smear campaign against them though.

      • blackbrook@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Oh agreed. I wouldn’t want to install an OS from a fucking idiot either.

        (And I take your point that said idiot may also be a dishonest slime ball.)