Just a shower thought I had when thinking about claims like “80% of all code will be written by AI”…

    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I don’t think that’s true - or thst it is a bug. It would make reproducible builds impossible.

      • fragrantvegetable@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        My understanding was that clang isn’t deterministic by default but can be made deterministic with flags. I checked and this is still true but not for the reasons I thought. I assumed this was due to the way LLVM iterates over functions and basic blocks in a non-deterministic order (because of the way they are laid out in memory) and because some optimisations use heuristics. But it appears LLVM tries to make all optimisation passes deterministic. The remaining non-determinism comes from file paths and timestamps which can be worked around with the correct flags and some extra work to create reproducible builds.

        • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Thank you very much for looking it up! I learned something new thanks to you.

          So I guess in the end it is deterministic, because for a given set of inputs it always produces the same output, it’s just that file paths and timestamps must also be considered as input.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Say what you will, Turbo C++ in 1991 was dysfunctional for anything over 5 pages of code, a lot like LLMs a year ago.