• BenevolentOne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I agree with you on both points, and the third (these people are idiots), but I’m happy to debate you anyways.

    I think that we must actively dismantle traditional forms of knowledge (copyrights, private libraries, most of education) in favor of developing new completely open archives and internet based methods of organizing, developing, and interacting with knowledge.

    Does that do it for you?

    • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I mean I like your ideas but that doesn’t really address the “how” of educating. As in how are those materials presented to people?

      How do we ensure that children are actually being educated and not just glazing their eyes over as the info flows past? How do we ensure that that education is not just “God did it, now shit up.” How do we get people to be interested in learning and not just stop the second someone isn’t pointing a gun at their head?

      • BenevolentOne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        I guess we’ll have to learn how to do that.

        For a lot of people, education is “we will hold a gun to your head until you pass the exam”. For a lot of people, education is seminary school, and in many circles the priests are the best educated folks around.

        If I don’t send my kids to school, a nice lady with a uniform and a gun comes around, and this is ‘civilization’?

        It sounds like you’re worried education will, ‘become Bible school at the point of a gun’, but where I am it already is, and these aren’t the new models I’m talking about.

        I’m talking about free access and communication as the pillars of education.