• catlover@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’d still be highly sceptical about pull requests with code created by llms. Personally what I noticed is that the author of such pr doesn’t even read the code, and i have to go through all the slop

    • kcuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Ya I’m finding myself being the bad code generator at work as I’m scattered across so many things at the moment due to attrition and AI can do a lot of the boilerplate work, but it’s such a time and energy sink to fully review what it generates and I’ve found basic things I missed that others catch and shows the sloppiness. I usually take pride in my code, but I have no attachment to what’s generated and that’s exposing issues with trying to scale out using this

      • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 minutes ago

        Same. There’s reduction in workforce, pressure to move faster, and no good way to do that without sloppiness. I have never been this down on the industry before; it was never great, but now it’s terrible.