• dmention7@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This comparison is like saying that, because a car can be used to run over pedestrians at any time, there is no reason to be alarmed about people installing the Crosswalk-pocalypse 5000 (now with 30% more spikes!) on their front bumper.

    Of course we know people can discretely record you with a phone. The difference is that the fraction of people doing that is very small, while the percentage of people doing that with Meta glasses is basically 100%.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      the fraction of people doing that is very small, while the percentage of people doing that with Meta glasses is basically 100%.

      care to give me any citation at all on that?

      • dmention7@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Honestly, pulling it out of my ass.

        Now your turn… what is your definition of “very small”, and where is your citation that a larger percentage of the population uses their phone camera to discretely creep on people?