• Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    However you wanna describe it, the point is that we tend to look for the meaning behind the words because we are used to hearing badly spoken English.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        I did intend to say that I filtered the grammatical errors through, meaning that my brain was reading the pure meaning. You said that I allowed the errors through unfiltered, which is incorrect in my interpretation of the sentence since that would imply I would not be able to parse the meaning correctly, having to deal with grammar mistakes.

        Think about it, if you try to eat a porridge with chunks, you need to do extra effort processing the chunks through, hey spend time with them. But if you filter the chunks through, you can process the porridge faster. So no, your correction is incorrect actually, I meant what I said.

        It’s not that deep though, which is why I said that it really doesn’t matter how you want to describe it.

        PD: Also, the way you formed that sentence is annoying. Why don’t you explain the difference yourself instead of expecting others to do all the legwork in a conversation? You ask if I recognise THE difference, but there are many differences between those sentences in a given context, it depends on how you interpret it. It’s low key rude.

        • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You’re certainly allowed to feel your feelings, though they don’t change the simple fact that “filtering” by not filtering is literally impossible.

          Also, the aforementioned difference is “lose” vs. “loose”, fellow anon. Try not to knot your knickers this time. 😅🙃