I’m sharing this one because I’m curious what more knowledgeable people think about this one. Please take a peek at the article before joining the discussion, as my limited quote might have dropped useful information

The VPN industry runs on a promise. Pick almost any provider and the pitch is the same: “we don’t keep logs.” You hand over your entire internet connection and, in return, you get a pinky-promise that nobody is writing anything down.

For a lot of privacy-minded people, that promise stopped being good enough a while ago. A no-logs policy is only as honest as the company making it, and even an honest company can be hacked, subpoenaed, or quietly acquired.

Obscura VPN is trying to answer to that problem. Instead of asking you to trust its word, it splits the job across two independent companies so that neither one can tie your identity to your browsing. The first hop is Obscura’s own servers; the exit hop is run by Mullvad. a respected VPM company out of Sweden. Your traffic is end-to-end encrypted to Mullvad’s keys, so Obscura literally can’t read it, and Mullvad never sees who you are.

  • eremophila@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    “the exit hop is run by Mullvad. a respected VPM company out of Sweden.”

    been living under a rock?

  • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The pinky promise to not look at who you are on the tech side is only useful if it’s also accompanied with the promise to not know who you are on the business side ie.: not requiring any kind of payment data.

    Easily pay using Bitcoin’s Lightning Network for better privacy, instant payments, and lower transaction fees. We also accept Monero.

    Crypto? That’s almost worse!

    • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      As far as I’m aware, nobody has ever been identified by a Monero transaction or a Bitcoin lightning network transaction without getting verification from the other party, e.g., you send money to a company that retains records and gets subpoenaed. Bitcoin transactions made on the lightning network aren’t even recorded on the blockchain, so it’s completely immune to chain analysis.

  • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I doubt I’m more knowledgeable but the argument made is reasonable. I’m not totally convinced that trusting 2 providers is an improvement on trusting one. The point not canvassed in the article is that if Mullvad is the encrypted end point with keys then it doesn’t really matter if they don’t know who you are from account info, it’s not very hard for them to have an unencrypted data flow split off for inspection which sooner or later will provide sufficient info to identify you.

    Tl;dr if you trust mullvad deal with them directly. If you don’t trust mullvad this doesn’t actually fix that although it makes it harder and more effort to identify you it can still be done.

    I wouldnt pay a premium over mullvad’s price for this. No real value added.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 hours ago

    this isn’t a revolutionary concept or anything, it’s basically just tor, without the middle hop, and with entry nodes that knows who you are

  • Mas@feddit.fr
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The same people who were asking for a Google account so they could sign up for Obscura VPN beta 🤡