yogurtwrong@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 15 days agoAI disclosure is no longer required for the Linux Kernellemmy.worldimagemessage-square160linkfedilinkarrow-up1233arrow-down111file-textcross-posted to: linux@programming.dev
arrow-up1222arrow-down1imageAI disclosure is no longer required for the Linux Kernellemmy.worldyogurtwrong@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 15 days agomessage-square160linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: linux@programming.dev
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=14c897740388216acd59477a382de327d5e27ba4
minus-squareprovectus@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down3·15 days agoNetBSD has a clear stance on no ai.
minus-squareJack@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·15 days agoLLM code can be committed with “written approval by core.” https://www.netbsd.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html#%3A~%3Atext=written+approval
minus-squareCarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·15 days agoAs much as NetBSD takes a stand against AI, it’s not banned. They just said AI code has to be signed off by the core team.
NetBSD has a clear stance on no ai.
LLM code can be committed with “written approval by core.” https://www.netbsd.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html#%3A~%3Atext=written+approval
As much as NetBSD takes a stand against AI, it’s not banned. They just said AI code has to be signed off by the core team.
Also Haiku OS and Ironclad OS