Maven (famous)@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 7 months agoSome Valentine's Lovelemmy.worldimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10
arrow-up17arrow-down1imageSome Valentine's Lovelemmy.worldMaven (famous)@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 7 months agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareRikj000@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoNice try CloudFlare, but I’m still picking Quad9 any day over you: https://www.quad9.net/
minus-squareRikj000@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoI don’t trust CloudFlare with my data, assume they will sell it since it’s a for-profit company. Meanwhile Quad9 touts about not logging IPs and being GDPR compliant.
minus-squareumbrella@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-27 months agois quad9 a nonprofit? what makes them trustworthy wih that claim?
minus-squareGuntrigger@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoI Googled them because I was interested. The answer is yes. Sony failed to sue them, hoping to force them to block copyright breach adjacent DNS resolvers. That feels like a badge of honour.
minus-squarelitchralee@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoOh wow, that might be the shortest-representation IPv6 DNS server I’ve seen to date: 2620:fe::9
minus-squarep1mrx@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months ago2a09:: 2a11:: and 2409:: are the shortest.
minus-squarelitchralee@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoDo you recommend dns.sb?
minus-squarep1mrx@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoI found them via IP address, so I don’t know anything about the company beyond that.
minus-squarePowerCrazy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-27 months agoYou can have .0 as a host. 10.0.1.0/23 is a perfectly valid host, same with 10.0.0.255/23
minus-squareSteveTech@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoNah, apparently it’s completely valid to end IPv6 addresses with a 0. And I haven’t done much research, but it seems IPv6 really doesn’t have network addresses the way IPv4 does. Also you can ping them and they reply.
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months ago9.9.9.9 has twice the latency for me. Why pick quad9 over, say, 1.1.1.2?
Nice try CloudFlare,
but I’m still picking Quad9 any day over you:
https://www.quad9.net/
why do you like it better?
I don’t trust CloudFlare with my data,
assume they will sell it since it’s a for-profit company.
Meanwhile Quad9 touts about not logging IPs and being GDPR compliant.
is quad9 a nonprofit?
what makes them trustworthy wih that claim?
I Googled them because I was interested. The answer is yes.
Sony failed to sue them, hoping to force them to block copyright breach adjacent DNS resolvers. That feels like a badge of honour.
Oh wow, that might be the shortest-representation IPv6 DNS server I’ve seen to date: 2620:fe::9
2a09:: 2a11:: and 2409:: are the shortest.
Do you recommend dns.sb?
I found them via IP address, so I don’t know anything about the company beyond that.
That’s networks, not hosts
You can have .0 as a host. 10.0.1.0/23 is a perfectly valid host, same with 10.0.0.255/23
Nah, apparently it’s completely valid to end IPv6 addresses with a 0. And I haven’t done much research, but it seems IPv6 really doesn’t have network addresses the way IPv4 does.
Also you can ping them and they reply.
9.9.9.9 has twice the latency for me. Why pick quad9 over, say, 1.1.1.2?
Swiss