Maven (famous)@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoSome Valentine's Lovelemmy.worldimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down10
arrow-up18arrow-down1imageSome Valentine's Lovelemmy.worldMaven (famous)@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareRikj000@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoNice try CloudFlare, but I’m still picking Quad9 any day over you: https://www.quad9.net/
minus-squareRikj000@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI don’t trust CloudFlare with my data, assume they will sell it since it’s a for-profit company. Meanwhile Quad9 touts about not logging IPs and being GDPR compliant.
minus-squareGuntrigger@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI Googled them because I was interested. The answer is yes. Sony failed to sue them, hoping to force them to block copyright breach adjacent DNS resolvers. That feels like a badge of honour.
minus-squarelitchralee@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOh wow, that might be the shortest-representation IPv6 DNS server I’ve seen to date: 2620:fe::9
minus-squarep1mrx@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year ago2a09:: 2a11:: and 2409:: are the shortest.
minus-squarelitchralee@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoDo you recommend dns.sb?
minus-squarep1mrx@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI found them via IP address, so I don’t know anything about the company beyond that.
minus-squareSteveTech@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoNah, apparently it’s completely valid to end IPv6 addresses with a 0. And I haven’t done much research, but it seems IPv6 really doesn’t have network addresses the way IPv4 does. Also you can ping them and they reply.
minus-squarePowerCrazy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoYou can have .0 as a host. 10.0.1.0/23 is a perfectly valid host, same with 10.0.0.255/23
minus-squareEager Eagle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year ago9.9.9.9 has twice the latency for me. Why pick quad9 over, say, 1.1.1.2?
Nice try CloudFlare,
but I’m still picking Quad9 any day over you:
https://www.quad9.net/
deleted by creator
I don’t trust CloudFlare with my data,
assume they will sell it since it’s a for-profit company.
Meanwhile Quad9 touts about not logging IPs and being GDPR compliant.
deleted by creator
I Googled them because I was interested. The answer is yes.
Sony failed to sue them, hoping to force them to block copyright breach adjacent DNS resolvers. That feels like a badge of honour.
Oh wow, that might be the shortest-representation IPv6 DNS server I’ve seen to date: 2620:fe::9
2a09:: 2a11:: and 2409:: are the shortest.
Do you recommend dns.sb?
I found them via IP address, so I don’t know anything about the company beyond that.
That’s networks, not hosts
Nah, apparently it’s completely valid to end IPv6 addresses with a 0. And I haven’t done much research, but it seems IPv6 really doesn’t have network addresses the way IPv4 does.
Also you can ping them and they reply.
You can have .0 as a host. 10.0.1.0/23 is a perfectly valid host, same with 10.0.0.255/23
9.9.9.9 has twice the latency for me. Why pick quad9 over, say, 1.1.1.2?
Swiss