I’ve been using this search engine and I have to say I’m absolutely in love with it.

Search results are great, Google level even. Can’t tell you how happy I am after trying multiple privacy oriented engines and always feeling underwhelmed with them.

Have you tried it? What are your thoughts on it?

  • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s ridiculously expensive. It’s not private if you have to link your searches to a paid account and none of those payment providers are private. They don’t seem to have open sourced any of their key functionality, meaning you have to trust them to not be collecting your activity data.

    I spent a long time getting rid of software and using services that I either no longer trusted or was unable to make an informed choice due to their lack of open source code and I’m not going to take a retrograde step now. And that’s without the issue with their choice (a continued choice I believe) to use Brave results, a company I’m personally not prepared to support.

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If they don’t cache your search history to your identity, which they claim they don’t, then I’m not sure why that’s a problem.

      • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Because claiming they don’t is not the same as being able to verify they don’t by making their code open source.

  • bitduck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve had better results than on Google in many cases. Also leaves DDG and other privacy relevant alternatives in the dust.

    But, unless you are a power user it’s hard to justify the cost. Very pricey.

    • Dirk Darkly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The starter tier is only $5/month for 300 searches, which is more than enough for your average user.

      I can get not wanting to pay for search, but I wouldn’t call $5 “very pricey”. In fact, I’d be so bold as to call it reasonable.

      • force@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have 2000 searches in the past 7 days… 300 searches a month seems so miniscule

      • million@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Maybe I am not average but I blow past 300 pretty easily. I also think you may underestimating how much people search on their phones.

        • kevincox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Same here. I tried on the starter plan but had to upgrade. According to my account I have made 802 searches since January 4th. So 17.4 searches a day on average. This means that for a 31 day month I am looking at 620 searches.

          I am also a heavy user of bookmarks and browser history. So I don’t rely on search to open specific sites (like searching for “facebook” which is one of Google’s most popular queries). So someone who is in the habit of using search for direct navigation is probably going to be a good chunk higher.

          That being said I work on the computer and do a fair number of searches for my job. So I can believe that a light user is pretty comfortable at 300 searches a month. But moderate searches or people who use the search engine for navigation will need the unlimited plan.

  • JoYo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    From my brief interactions with the dev I believe they’re doing things the very hard way when it comes to indexing.

    It might be the only choice once AI poisoning becomes prolific. It’s already corrupted the niche topics and soon it may overwhelm the topics with more human eyes on it.