• orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The legal standard in the U.S. is if there’s exigent circumstances. Detailed 911 calls are typically sufficient to meet that standard. Not always.

    Right now, we cannot tell if the officers did anything unlawful. Need the call recording or call logs, plus the body cameras.

    (I think the exigent circumstances standard is BS, easily abused, but that is the current law of the land.)

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I know. And many of the comments are coming from the US, so I’m trying to help American readers see what US law would dictate in a similar situation, because they might have instincts that are inconsistent with US law.

        • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          The police also knocked and only entered after he answered it sounded like. While certainly armed and probably prepared for something wild, they didn’t force entry with guns at the ready.

          Once again, mostly comparing to videos of US police interactions, which is kind of weird as a non-USian commenting on a German police interrogation. Would be curious to see an “audit the audit” type review of this.