• WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    4 days ago

    The nazi loved the “nothing to hide”. What better than all your information, like religion, nicely written down in official records if you want to suddenly round up one specific group of people. Or DEI wanting to deport a certain group, and DOGE doing their best to suck up all information on everybody. You may have nothing to fear right now, but you never know who’s going to be in office soon.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      You may have nothing to fear right now, but you never know who’s going to be in office soon.

      The way I always explain it to people - take any additional government power or access to information you either don’t care about or actively support. Now imagine whoever you oppose/hate the most taking office and trying to use that against your interests. Are you still OK with them having that power? Same principle applies regardless of what power or who’s pushing for it.

      It’s like due process - you don’t want any category of alleged violation not to be subject to due process, and if you don’t understand why then it’s time to wrongfully accuse you of doing that so you understand the problem.

    • toastmeister@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I still think DOGE is just feeding all that information to Palantir, and everything else is a pretext to that goal. They want an AI embedded directly into the government, making a large dependency on it, and bypassing checks and balances quickly has allowed that to happen.

    • El_guapazo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Like those people that signed up for DNA sequencing for heritage research. Now that info is going to be sold. The problem is it could be used to discriminate for health insurance or other nefarious reasons

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    ok ill be the one to say it then: the NSA are fascists. the NSA is evil.

    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      What is your definition of Fascist, here?

      It seems to get tossed around at everything, these days. Not a fan if the NSA either, nor the Patriot Act, either.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        fascism is capitalism showing its teeth, like what trump is doing more overtly now. one part of it involves enforcing a bolder and more baldfaced surveillance/police state.

        the NSA is literally one of the intelligence arms of said surveillance state. they help manipulate people, find and disappear dissidents, suppress resistance and such. not unlike a few other 3 letter agencies.

        they’ve been quacking like fascists way before trump, they have feathers like fascists and swim like fascists. hence why i call it fascist.

        • INeedMana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          fascism is capitalism showing its teeth, like what trump is doing more overtly now

          AFAIK that is not the definition of fascism

          But I’ve seen a TikTok of someone who is studying politcal doctrines (IDR if their level was Major or PHD) and what is currently going on was ticking off all the boxes

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            there are many, sometimes conflicting definitions. this one sums it up.

            i focus on the police state and militarism part of it because thats what the NSA is for.

            and if it ticks all the damn boxes, thats wtf it is. your phd person on tiktok is probably referring to the 12 early signs. its been ticking them for decades now.

            but please don’t rely on tiktok to get informed and read up on it, regardless of what qualifications tiktokers claim to have. its slop that barely clears the basics at best.

  • JLock17@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    One of the things I warn people about privacy is that it’s not about what they might find, it’s about what they might pretend to find.

    Plenty of dirty cops plant evidence. Who’s to say they don’t like someone and keep a flash drive full of Cheese Pizza to plant on their computer. Usually that kind of logic gets people on board more easily.

  • Termight@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    “The early Internet’s dissociative opportunities actually encouraged me and those of my generation to change our most deeply held opinions, instead of just digging in and defending them when challenged. This ability to reinvent ourselves meant that we never had to close our minds by picking sides, or close ranks out of fear of doing irreparable harm to our reputations. Mistakes that were swiftly punished but swiftly rectified allowed both the community and the “offender” to move on. To me, and to many, this felt like freedom.” ~ Permanent Record, Snowden.

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    My response to this is usually “Do you have curtains?”

    Very late edit: I have found it very effective. It causes pause for thought because everyone values privacy, they just find it hard to picture themselves needing it. Curtains.

    • gazter@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      My response is similar, usually the good old ‘Do you shut the door when you shit?’.

      When we start getting specific, I’ll often try and frame data harvesting in a much more visceral way. If they say they don’t care that xyz keeps track of everyone they talk to, I ask them to imagine an actual person standing behind them, making notes on a clipboard about every interaction they have with someone, and how that would make them feel.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    He misattributes that quote

    https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1558

    You will find the quote in this book that predates Nazi Germany

    Not merely was my own mail opened, but the mail of all my relatives and friends—people residing in places as far apart as California and Florida. I recall the bland smile of a government official to whom I complained about this matter: “If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear.”

  • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    We desperately need a constitutional right to privacy, but I doubt that will happen in my or our country’s lifetime.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Which country? Plenty of countries have at least a nominal right to privacy, but it doesn’t end up meaning much when US companies own your country’s communications platforms.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Fuck me, the last part hit me HARD. I won’t get into the details why because it is painful for me to talk about it.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The answer to that Reddit post is to delete your account on Reddit.

    • Termight@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Weird how Edward Snowden is basically a Boddhisatwa and Julian Assange

      Defining someone a Bodhisattva is complex. Snowden & Assange acted with potential benefit & harm. True Bodhisattvas act from pure compassion & wisdom, embodying equanimity. Their actions offer reflection on truth & consequences.

        • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Exposing truth can often get people killed, especially if the liars are in the government, want to kill witnesses or rats, or at least make their lives hell for betraying the state. Depending on the severity, livelihoods are often at stake. That’s why very few people engage in whistleblowing. They’re aware that it will not get better for them.

        • Termight@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          Where is the harm?

          Snowden’s disclosures, while aiming for transparency, risked national security, compromised sources, strained relations, & potentially enabled misuse of info. Buddhist principles emphasize avoiding harm & maintaining order, aspects potentially impacted by his actions. A balanced view acknowledges both benefit & risk.

          • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            4 days ago

            Maintaining order in this context would mean letting some people harm other people’s privacy though.

            • Termight@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 days ago

              Maintaining order in this context would mean letting some people harm other people’s privacy though.

              You’re right to question “order” at the expense of privacy. Buddhist principles highlight interdependence & ethical action. Security shouldn’t erode fundamental rights. Privacy & security are interconnected, not opposing forces.

            • HubertManne@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              termights replies to you make me agree with your original statement. any harm was to things that are themselves overall harmful. Now that I look at it, it feels like between what we saw with snowden and schwartz it was 2013 when I really realized things are really really messed up.

    • gaja@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Retaliation for exposing the truth, likely to never speak the full truth again.

  • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I have “nothing to hide” but I STILL like privacy tyvm. Hence I’ll shit in public with the stall door closed, and not disclose my wank schedule on Facebook