• Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7か月前

    All the images are based on actual models in the games.

    Seems they painted over the 3D models, it’s clearly not AI if you longer than 5 seconds at it.

    • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7か月前

      I’m getting ready for work, so only have time to do one image, but this is pretty clearly AI generated. The other image is not quite as egregious, but if you take more than a passing glance at the car in the billboard ad, it is pretty obviously AI as well.

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7か月前

        “Random” artifacts that you can drive past in the actual game? Game is filled with these things to trick or grind over.

        • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7か月前

          That is probably why they are all differnt sizes and the flag part is different (or non existent) in each one.

          The images might be based off in game assets, but if those are not AI then the artist certainly has a style that mimics AI art. I don’t think that is the case, though

        • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7か月前

          AI art looks terrible, is almost always trained on stolen art, and is typically environmentally unsound. There are genuinely good uses for AI, art is not one of them.

          We are talking about this specifically because there is reason enough to doubt Nintendo saying they didn’t use it. Nintendo may have used their own assets to train any alleged AI, buy them shutting down the conversation means we will never know.